Google Veo 2 vs. Google Veo 3: Audio Makes a World of Difference
We tested Google Veo 2 and Veo 3 side-by-side with the same prompts. The jump in quality might surprise you.
John Angelo Yap
Updated June 23, 2025
A robot directing a movie, generated with GPT
Reading Time: 6 minutes
We’ve seen AI generate video for a while now, but much more than Runway or OpenAI’s model, Google’s Veo series has been the one to watch. Earlier versions showed promise but felt more like concepts than finished products.
Then Veo 3 dropped.
Native audio, better physics, higher resolution—on paper, it’s a massive upgrade. But what does that actually look like? Is it all just hype, or is it finally the kind of AI video that doesn’t scream "made by a model" the moment you hit play?
So I ran the same prompts through both Veo 2 and Veo 3 to see what’s really changed. Some matchups were close. Others weren’t.
What is Google Veo?
Google Veo is Google’s entry to high-quality AI-generated video. It’s a generative video model that can take your text descriptions or still images and turn them into full-blown, high-definition video clips. In other words: it gives you a way to produce cinematic content without needing a production team.
Unlike early AI video tools that just loop short animations, Veo understands actual film language. You can prompt it with things like “aerial shot of a mountain range at sunset” or “timelapse of a city waking up,” and it gets what you mean—including camera movements, lens styles, and lighting.
Earlier versions (Veo 1 and Veo 2) introduced key features like text-to-video and image-to-video generation, realistic motion, and control over cinematic effects. It’s also built for consistency, meaning characters, objects, and environments stay coherent over time: a major challenge for most AI video models.
You can access it through platforms like Vertex AI, and some of its creative tools are already baked into Google’s consumer-facing products.
What’s New With Google Veo 3?
Veo 3 takes everything from earlier versions and levels it up, especially in the areas where previous models fell short.
The biggest headline? It now generates native audio. That includes synced dialogue, Foley sound effects, and background music—all automatically built into the video output. No more hunting down stock music or manually syncing sound in post. It's one of the first major models to treat sound as part of the generation pipeline, not an afterthought.
Visual quality also gets a serious boost. Veo 3 supports 4K resolution and shows much better physics—things like lighting, smoke, fabric movement, and reflections behave more naturally. This makes everything feel less synthetic and more like something you’d expect from an actual production house.
There’s also better scene coherence over time. Previous versions struggled with character consistency in clips longer than a few seconds. Veo 3 handles up to 60 seconds while keeping things visually aligned. That’s huge if you're trying to tell an actual story rather than just generate short loops.
And then there’s multimodal prompting: you can now feed Veo a mix of text, reference images, or even rough storyboards. That means more creative control without needing to be ultra-technical.
Access-wise, Veo 3 is starting to roll out more broadly, but many premium features are tied to paid tiers like the Google AI Ultra plan. So while it’s more powerful, it's also moving into “pro tool” territory with subscription-based access.
Bottom line: Veo 3 isn’t just about flashier visuals. It’s about making AI video generation more complete, more flexible, and way more usable for serious creative work…
…at least, on paper. Let’s now see it in action.
Google Veo 2 vs. Google Veo 3: How Far Did They Come?
100 Men vs. A Gorilla
Google Veo 2
Google Veo 3
Veo 2 gets points for composition, but the scene lacks depth and variety. The background characters all move in the same robotic way—like NPCs stuck in a loop. There’s no audio either, which makes it feel more like a concept preview than a finished video.
Veo 3, on the other hand, is a different beast (literally). The audio here, with the news anchor narrating the scene, adds a layer of realism that Veo 2 just can’t touch. Physics-wise, it's more grounded. Movements feel intentional, and characters behave more naturally within the environment. It’s less uncanny valley, more “this could be real.”
Barista in a Coffee Shop
Google Veo 2
Google Veo 3
Veo 2 actually has stronger framing in this one. The cinematography feels more grounded, and the lighting is more atmospheric. But without audio, the intent of the scene is hard to pin down. You get stress from the barista’s face, but not much else.
Veo 3 isn’t as visually polished here, but it makes up for that with context. The audio fills in the blanks: the way the cup hits the counter, the dialogue. It helps you understand the mood, even if the shot isn’t perfect. On its own, it feels like a complete clip. Veo 2 feels like a shot list.
A Sliding Into Their DMs Workshop at the Y
Google Veo 2
Google Veo 3
This one’s close. Veo 2 nails the shot composition. The close-up gives it that indie film vibe. But again, it’s missing audio — which makes it feel detached, like something you'd see in a stock video collection.
Veo 3 includes audio that adds humor and social cues, but the visuals feel more sterile. The plain white background strips away any character. It’s technically solid, but emotionally flat. If Veo 2 had sound, it would’ve taken this round.
Gender Reveal House Explosion
Google Veo 2
Google Veo 3
No contest here. Veo 3 takes the win. While it’s still not perfect (some motion physics are exaggerated), it’s far more believable than Veo 2, which struggles with movement and continuity. The explosion in Veo 2 feels like a looping GIF. In Veo 3, it feels like a (slightly chaotic) event.
The Bottom Line
Google Veo 3 is a clear upgrade in almost every category that matters: better realism, physics, context, and overall storytelling. Native audio changes the game entirely, and longer video coherence opens up actual use cases beyond short clips.
That said, Veo 2 isn’t without its strengths. It sometimes delivers better framing, and the lack of audio can make it easier to overlay custom sound. But in a world where realism and clarity matter, Veo 3 just feels more finished.
These aren’t just iterations—they’re different tiers of polish. Veo 3 is where AI video starts feeling production-ready… and maybe even a little scary.
Want to Learn Even More?
If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to our free newsletter where we share tips & tricks on how to use tech & AI to grow and optimize your business, career, and life.
