Undetectable AI vs. Ryne AI: Which is the Better AI Bypasser?

Can Ryne AI’s Humanizer compete with Undetectable AI, the tool that built its reputation on staying hidden from detectors?

John Angelo Yap

Updated October 6, 2025

Two robots using a typewriter, generated with GPT

Two robots using a typewriter, generated with GPT

Reading Time: 5 minutes

When it comes to AI humanizers, the market is starting to split into two categories. On one side, you’ve got the veterans — tools like Undetectable AI, which built its reputation on rewriting AI text so smoothly that it slips past most detectors. 

On the other side, you’ve got newer players like Ryne AI, which don’t just stop at rewriting but offer entire ecosystems of tools that expand what an AI assistant can do.

Both promise to help users who don’t just want AI-generated text, but AI-generated text that looks and feels human. The question is: which one actually performs better when it comes to the ultimate challenge — bypassing detectors?

Let’s break it down.

What is Undetectable AI?

Undetectable AI has been around for a while now, and its focus has always been clear: make AI writing undetectable. You paste in content from something like ChatGPT, pick the tone you want, and the tool rewrites it in a way that feels convincingly human.

Over time, the platform has evolved. It’s no longer just about raw bypassing power — it now balances readability with authenticity. That’s why it’s gained traction with students, content creators, and professionals who want text that doesn’t sound robotic. It has also introduced new tools like the AI Smart Applier and AI Essay Writer.

But at its core, the mission hasn’t changed: beat the detectors without breaking the flow of the writing.

What is Ryne AI?

Ryne AI is newer on the scene, but it comes armed with a full toolkit. Instead of just focusing on humanization, it’s pitched more as an all-in-one AI productivity suite. The main tools include:

  • Humanizer – Similar to Undetectable AI’s flagship tool, it rewrites AI-generated text to make it look human.
  • Ryne Chat – A conversational AI assistant that integrates with different tools, a bit like ChatGPT but with added flexibility.
  • Essay Composer – Generates essays with citations baked in, which is a big appeal for students.
  • AI Report – Tests your content against multiple AI detectors and gives you scores, so you know how “human” your text appears.
  • AI Editor – A polishing tool that helps refine AI writing beyond just bypassing detection.

It’s a broader approach. Instead of specializing in one feature, Ryne AI tries to cover every step in the AI writing workflow.

A Quick Note

When I first opened Ryne AI, I got hit with a strong feeling of déjà vu — like it’s something I’ve already reviewed before. Turns out, I might be right.

This is CogniBypass’ homepage:

It’s almost a one-to-one copy of Ryne AI. So, I looked into both tools’ About page to investigate further. No mention of each tool, except that CogniBypass actually lists Ryne as one of its competitors.

Then I dug into the teams behind both bypassers — and it turns out, it’s just the same team.

So, why does this matter?

Well, two tools having the same team behind them isn’t something completely unheard of, especially in today’s world where almost anyone can have a startup. That said, I do think a little transparency would be good — especially since Ryne’s starting price is $10 more than CogniBypass. After all, from the end user’s perspective, why pay for something that you can get $10 cheaper?

Undetectable AI vs. Ryne AI: Readability

Original Essay

While helium is often associated with harmless party balloons and funny voice effects, it poses several dangers that are frequently overlooked. Though chemically inert and non-toxic, helium can be hazardous under certain conditions, particularly when misused or mishandled.


One of the most immediate risks involves inhalation. People sometimes inhale helium to produce a high-pitched voice, unaware that doing so displaces oxygen in the lungs. Breathing in helium from a balloon once or twice may seem benign, but repeated inhalation—or worse, sucking helium directly from pressurized tanks—can lead to oxygen deprivation, loss of consciousness, or even death due to asphyxiation. There have been documented fatalities, especially among teenagers attempting the act for social media content or group entertainment.


Another danger lies in the use of pressurized helium tanks. These tanks, if improperly stored or handled, can become explosive hazards. A sudden release of high-pressure gas can cause serious physical injury, and leaks in confined spaces can create oxygen-deficient environments, posing a risk to anyone nearby.

Undetectable AI

Ryne AI

Helium exists mainly in the public imagination as a harmless gas used for balloons and voice effects yet it presents multiple dangers that people tend to ignore. Helium remains chemically inert and non-toxic but it becomes dangerous when people misuse or mishandle it.


The primary danger from helium exposure occurs when people breathe it in. People who inhale helium to achieve a high-pitched voice do not realize that this action removes oxygen from their lungs. The apparent safety of inhaling helium from balloons once or twice does not mean it is harmless because repeated inhalation or direct tank suction can result in fatal asphyxiation and oxygen deprivation and loss of consciousness. Several documented deaths have occurred because teenagers used helium for social media content creation and group entertainment purposes.


The main threat emerges from handling pressurized helium tanks. The improper storage or handling of these tanks turns them into explosive dangers. The rapid discharge of high-pressure gas produces dangerous physical harm to people and the formation of oxygen-deficient areas in enclosed spaces creates risks for nearby individuals.

Helium is commonly known for harmless party balloons and funny voices. But helium has dangers which most people don’t know about. Helium is chemically and biologically inert and non-toxic. However, it can be hazardous under certain conditions.


One of the most immediate risks involves inhalation. Some people inhale helium to make their voice sound high-pitched without knowing it replaces oxygen in the lungs. Taking in helium from a balloon once or twice doesn’t sound very harmful. However, repeated inhalation can cause deprivation of oxygen and, worse, sucking helium from pressurized tanks can result in loss of consciousness or death by asphyxiation. Many people, especially teens, who try this for social media content or a group activity have died doing this.


Another danger lies in the use of pressurized helium tanks. If mishandled or stored wrongly, these tanks may explode.  If there is a sudden release of a high-pressure gas, that physical injury will happen because of it. Meanwhile, some other leaks in confined spaces will create an oxygen-deficient environment, which is quite hazardous for anyone nearby.

I'll give Undetectable AI credit where it's due — it actually tries to elevate the language and maintain academic rigor. Yes, some sentences get chunky (that opening marathon could use a comma), but chunky isn't the same as wrong. 

This feels like someone who knows how to write but got a little carried away with formality. The content stays faithful to the original, and there's real effort in varying sentence structure.

Grade: B- — Ambitious and mostly successful, with some rough edges.

Ryne AI, on the other hand, tried to make the essay more "accessible" and ended up sounding like it was written by someone who learned about helium five minutes ago. 

"But helium has dangers which most people don't know about"? That awkward phrasing makes me cringe. It changes "chemically inert" to "chemically and biologically inert" for no reason, loses the original's measured tone with phrases like "doesn't sound very harmful," and that final sentence about leaks is just grammatically broken.

Grade: D — Tries to be friendly but ends up being sloppy and imprecise.

Undetectable AI vs. Ryne AI: Humanizing AI Content

Test #1

Undetectable AI: Identified as human (Passed)
AI Likelihood Score: 0%

Ryne: Identified as AI (Failed)
AI Likelihood Score: 99.9%

Test #2

Undetectable AI: Identified as human (Passed)
AI Likelihood Score: 0.2%

Ryne: Identified as AI (Failed)
AI Likelihood Score: 85.4%

Test #3

Undetectable AI: Identified as human (Passed)
AI Likelihood Score: 0%

Ryne: Identified as human (Passed)
AI Likelihood Score: 0%

Test #4

Undetectable AI: Identified as human (Passed)
AI Likelihood Score: 0%

Ryne: Identified as AI (Failed)
AI Likelihood Score: 99.8%

Test #5

Undetectable AI: Identified as human (Passed)
AI Likelihood Score: 0%

Ryne: Identified as AI (Failed)
AI Likelihood Score: 96.6%

Average Score

Undetectable AI

Ryne AI

Test #1

0%

99.9%

Test #2

0.2%

85.4%

Test #3

0%

0%

Test #4

0%

99.8%

Test #5

0%

96.6%

Average

~0%

76.34%

So, Which Should You Go For?

After putting both tools through testing, the results honestly weren’t even close. Undetectable AI came out completely invisible to detectors — its outputs consistently registered as 0% AI content. 

On top of that, the writing itself felt smoother and more natural, with better flow and readability. It didn’t just bypass detection — it read like something a real person sat down and wrote the whole thing, but it does admittedly still have a few grammar errors.

Ryne AI, on the other hand, struggled. My tests showed its outputs were flagged as AI content 76.34% of the time, which makes it far less reliable if your main goal is to stay hidden. 

When it comes to bypassing detectors and sounding convincingly human, Undetectable AI is still simply in a league of its own.

Want to Learn Even More?

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to our free newsletter where we share tips & tricks on how to use tech & AI to grow and optimize your business, career, and life.


Written by John Angelo Yap

Hi, I'm Angelo. I'm currently an undergraduate student studying Software Engineering. Now, you might be wondering, what is a computer science student doing writing for Gold Penguin? I took up studying computer science because it was practical and because I was good at it. But, if I had the chance, I'd be writing for a career. Building worlds and adjectivizing nouns for no other reason other than they sound good. And that's why I'm here.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

0 Comments
Most Voted
Newest Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments